Diocese knew of abuses years before it claims to have first known.
Article Title

Lake Charles Diocese knew of abuses years before listed dates; helped priests continue careers

Link to Article:      https://www.theadvocate.com/acadiana/news/article_ec82f556-a8ce-11e9-8b08-7fb7c465b43c.html

Source:  Acadiana Advocate

Author(s):  Ben Meyers

Date:  July 19, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

The Diocese of Lake Charles joined its six Louisiana counterparts three months ago in releasing a list of clergymen from its jurisdiction who have been “credibly accused” of sexually abusing minors. The lists were intended to answer nationwide public demands for accountability and transparency.

But although the Lake Charles list named predatory priests, it did so in a way that was less than transparent. 

Church officials learned of the abuses of two priests, Gerard Smit and Mark Broussard, years before the dates shown on the new list, records show. The discrepancies conceal periods in which the bishop at that time, Jude Speyrer, and others were aware of allegations and helped abusers continue their pastoral careers. 

Current Lake Charles church leaders say the “dates allegations received” entries reflect when victims put accusations in writing. That threshold was intended to ensure a consistent standard and not to deceive the public, church officials told The Advocate. But it also overlooks clear evidence that the bishop and others knew of abuses and failed to act.

Speyrer, for example, acknowledged in a 1986 letter that he had recently received a complaint that Smit “had been involved in some improper fondling of some small girls about twenty years ago” — in the mid-1960s, in other words — and that Smit did not deny it.

So Speyrer sent Smit to a Catholic-run psychological treatment center in Jemez Springs, New Mexico, and then referred Smit to the Diocese of Wilmington, Delaware, the next year “in good standing.”

Nonetheless, the diocese’s list says it first received allegations against Smit in 2002, making no mention of the allegations Speyrer received 16 years earlier.

In 1988, two years after Smit was treated in New Mexico, Broussard, the other of the two priests, was shipped to the same facility. That’s the year Broussard has said repeatedly that he admitted his abuses to diocesan officials.

However, the new diocesan list says church officials first received allegations against Broussard in 1994, six years after he was sent away for treatment. During that six-year span, Broussard worked as a Lake Charles hospital chaplain and as pastor at St. Eugene Church in Grand Chenier.

Allegations later surfaced that Broussard abused children in both of those assignments.

Smit and Broussard had been exposed as abusers long before the diocese released its list. Smit has never faced criminal prosecution, but the Diocese of Wilmington identified him on its list of credibly accused clergymen in 2006. Smit landed on the Wilmington list after a man told the diocese that Smit had abused him at St. Anne Church in Youngsville in the early 1960s.

Broussard, meanwhile, was convicted by a Calcasieu Parish jury in 2016 of five counts related to sexually assaulting minors, and he is now serving two life terms plus 55 years at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola.

However, the men who knew about their abuse and allowed them to continue in the ministry have not faced the same public scrutiny. In addition to Speyrer, they include the Rev. Henry Mancuso, a well-known retired priest who comes from a prominent Lake Charles family. Mancuso arranged for Broussard to work as a hospital chaplain after Broussard disclosed to Mancuso in 1988 that he had abused several children, according to Broussard’s statements to church officials a decade later.

Mancuso, reached by telephone, refused to discuss his 1988 conversation with Broussard, though he did acknowledge trying to help the predatory priest.

“I did whatever I could do to help him move beyond his time at the place in New Mexico,” Mancuso said by telephone.

Asked if that had allowed Broussard to continue abusing children, Mancuso said he didn’t know. The Broussard case is “old history,” Mancuso said before hanging up.

West Virginia diocese agrees to independent audit after pressure from lay group.
Article Title

After pressure from lay group, West Virginia diocese agrees to audit

Link to Article:       https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/after-pressure-lay-group-west-virginia-diocese-agrees-audit

Source:  National Catholic Reporter

Author(s):  Peter Feuerherd

Date:  July 19, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

A lay group that urged West Virginia Catholics to withhold support for their diocese claimed victory after Archbishop William Lori announced July 17 that the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston will undergo an independent financial audit. 

“I clearly understand that the Church has a long way to go to regain your confidence and trust,” Lori, archbishop of Baltimore who is also serving as administrator for the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston, wrote to West Virginia’s Catholics. Lori disclosed that the diocese would engage the services of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP for a full audit of its finances.

Lay Catholic Voices for Change sent Lori a July 9 letter signed by more than 800 West Virginia Catholics urging the archbishop to institute an audit. The group had urged Catholics not to donate to diocesan causes this weekend. It said it is now calling off its “Not a Dime for the Diocese” campaign.

“This is an important first step in a long process of reform,” said Charles DiSalvo, a member of the group’s Steering Committee. “It is a basic structural change that will help bring about a healthier distribution of power between the hierarchy and West Virginia Catholics. Up to now, the diocese has kept the laity in the dark regarding its actual income and expenditures. With this increased measure of information, West Virginia Catholics will be that much more empowered to see that the funds they entrust to the diocese are spent properly.”

Dolan, RC cardinal and archbishop of New York
Article Title

Cardinal Dolan Refuses to Remove Priest Accused of Sexually Abusing Eight Children

Link to Article:        https://pinellas.legalexaminer.com/legal/cardinal-dolan-refuses-to-remove-priest-accused-of-sexually-abusing-eight-children/

Source:  Legal Examiner

Author(s):  Joseph H. Saunders

Date:  June 26, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

For the second time in six month’s Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York, refuses to remove a priest accused of sexual abuse.  The latest incident involves Monsignor John Paddack, stationed at Church of Notre Dame on W. 114th St. in  Manhattan.

The priest has been accused of sexual abuse by eight different individuals and the Archdiocese, and specifically Cardinal Dolan, has known about the allegations since 2012 but has stubbornly refused to take action.   

According to Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, this is the second time in the past year that Cardinal Dolan kept the vulnerable in harm’s way. Just six months ago it was revealed that Fr. Donald Timone, himself twice-accused of abuse, was able to stay on the job even though Catholic officials paid one of his victims a six figure settlement.

Cardinal Dolan has spoken publicly about his concern for survivors of sexual abuse by priests but his actions belie his words.  When the NY state legislature was considering helping survivors by enacting statute of limitations reform, the Cardinal had his lobbyists spending money and fighting vigorously against the measure.  Fortunately, this year, the legislation finally passed and NY sex abuse survivors can now hold the Archdiocese of New York and other dioceses in NY accountable for aiding and abetting abusive priests.

What makes Dolan’s refusal to remove these priests from ministry is his arrogant flaunting of the bishops Dallas Charter which clearly states that such priests should be removed from ministry.  It’s a Charter which he said he supports and helped create when the bishops met that summer in Texas.

Dolan’s history of protecting abusive priests as well as the church’s assets is long and worth noting.  In 2013, a NY Times opinion piece related, “Tragic as the sexual abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Church has been, it is shocking to discover that Cardinal Timothy Dolan, while archbishop of Milwaukee, moved $57 million off the archdiocesan books into a cemetery trust fund six years ago in order to protect the money from damage suits by victims of abuse by priests.

Cardinal Dolan, now the archbishop of New York, has denied shielding the funds as an “old and discredited” allegation and “malarkey.” But newly released court documents make it clear that he sought and received fast approval from the Vatican to transfer the money just as the Wisconsin Supreme Court was about to open the door to damage suits by victims raped and abused as children by Roman Catholic clergy.

 

Bishops can be policed only by other bishops — all in favor, raise your hands
Article Title

Catholic bishops adopt long-promised abuse plan — for bishops to police bishops

Link to Article:         https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2019/06/13/catholic-bishops-adopt-long-promised-abuse-plan-bishops-police-bishops/?utm_term=.12f5b922aec7

Source:  Washington Post

Author(s):  Julie Zauzmer and Michelle Boorstein

Date:  June 13, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

After a year of scandal, some disheartened believers say the new rules, which don’t require lay involvement, do not go far enough.   

On 06-13-2019, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops formally adopted new procedures for policing themselves in regard to the handling of clergy sexual abuse allegations.   But to some “aggrieved believers,” the procedures are inherently flawed because the power to decide what to actually do about such allegations remains entirely with archbishops, who may or may not call in civil authorities or lay investigators.      

According to the article:

“The bishops are the ones making the conclusions,” said Anne Burke, an Illinois Supreme Court justice who chaired the church’s National Review Board when the sexual abuse crisis first erupted in 2002. She called the new system enacted on Thursday “a fallacy.   “There should be no intermediary — call the police,” she said.   “There should be one interview, by professionals.”   

[The] new policy creates a national hotline, operated by an outside vendor, for Catholics to call or write with complaints that a bishop has abused a child, sexually harassed an adult or mishandled an abuse report.   

When the hotline receives a report, it will ordinarily relay it to a leading bishop in the region where the accused bishop works or worked. The bishop who receives the report will be responsible for reporting to law enforcement and to the Vatican, and for bringing in laypeople to help investigate the complaint. The measures also allow for bishops to direct the complaint calls to a layperson.   

That’s a far cry from the bishops’ original proposal, debated at their biannual meeting in November, which called for a national body of laypeople who would be empowered to investigate bishops. That idea collapsed when the Vatican insisted they wait until after a global bishops’ summit on sex abuse in February.   

“They’re finally doing the bare minimum,” said Adrienne Alexander, who organized nationwide protests calling for bishop accountability after a Pennsylvania grand jury report last summer revealed the extent of the abuse and coverup by the church. 

 

Sign outside St. Michael Archangel in Houston ( AP Photo/Wong Maye-E)
Article Title

Top US cardinal accused of mishandling aide’s sex abuse case

Link to Article:        https://www.apnews.com/8a80c0c1276f4cc485e0599e922759c2

Source:  Associated Press

Author(s):  Nicole Winfield/ AP   (AP writer Nomaan Merchant contributed to this story)

Date:  June 05, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

This is a lengthier and more detailed article by Nicole Winfield on the Pontikes-Rossi story, which story she initially reported via the Associated Press on June 4, 2019.   

According to the June 5th article:

When Cardinal Daniel DiNardo first met Laura Pontikes in his wood-paneled conference room in December 2016, the leader of the U.S. Catholic Church’s response to its sex abuse scandal said all the right things.

He praised her for coming forward to report that his deputy in the Galveston-Houston archdiocese had manipulated her into a sexual relationship and declared her a “victim” of the priest, Pontikes said. Emails and other documents obtained by The Associated Press show that the relationship had gone on for years — even as the priest heard her confessions, counseled her husband on their marriage and pressed the couple for hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations.

She said the archdiocese assured her that the priest, Monsignor Frank Rossi, would never be a pastor or counsel women again.

Months after that meeting, though, she found out DiNardo had allowed Rossi to take a new job as pastor of a parish two hours away in east Texas. When her husband confronted DiNardo, he said, the cardinal warned that the archdiocese would respond aggressively to any legal challenge — and that the fallout would hurt their family and business.

Rossi’s sexual relationship with Pontikes is now the subject of a previously undisclosed criminal investigation in Houston. Yet it is DiNardo’s handling of the case that poses far-reaching questions for the church in the #MeToo era, when powerful men and institutions are being called to account over sex abuse.

The Galveston-Houston archdiocese acknowledged an inappropriate physical relationship between Rossi and Pontikes, but asserted that it was consensual and didn’t include sexual intercourse. In a statement to AP, it said Rossi was immediately placed on leave and went for counseling after Pontikes reported him.

Rossi returned to active ministry, without restrictions, based on recommendations from an out-of-state “renewal” program for clergy he completed, the statement said.   

Pontikes filed a police report in August. Under Texas criminal law, a member of the clergy can be charged with sexual assault of an adult if the priest exploited an emotional dependency in a spiritual relationship.   

In all, the Pontikeses said they gave the church about $2 million over nine years, and Rossi asked for more, including $750,000 for a new school chapel they couldn’t afford. The archdiocese countered that their construction firm benefited from contracts worth $24 million over that time.   

Throughout the relationship, Pontikes said, Rossi was her confessor. On Dec. 20, 2012, about two weeks after their first sexual embrace in Rossi’s office, he agreed to hear her confession, “I would be most happy to celebrate the sacrament of reconciliation with you if you would like.”

A few months later, Pontikes was rushing to catch a flight to visit a friend whose husband had died. Guilt-ridden about her growing intimacy with Rossi, she wanted to ease her conscience with confession before leaving town.

He was not happy with her request and said he didn’t have time. But she chased him down, followed him out the side chapel and made him hear her, according to Pontikes. She confessed that she had been inappropriate with her priest.

He absolved her of their sin, she said, and told her, “Go forth and sin no more.”

The so-called “absolution of an accomplice” crime, one of the most serious in canon law, must be reported to the Vatican and can carry the penalty of excommunication. It occurs when a priest absolves someone with whom he has engaged in a sexual sin, including merely a lustful touch.

Frank Rossi, former aid to Cardinal DiNardo (AP Photo/Wong May-E)
Article Title

Woman accuses top US cardinal of dismissing sex abuse case

Link to Article:        https://www.apnews.com/8d01805d128d415ea280b7da538ebaa2

Source:  Associated Press

Author(s):  Nicole Winfield/ AP   (AP writer Nomaan Merchant contributed to this story)

Date:  June 05, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

The cardinal leading the U.S. Catholic Church’s response to the sex abuse crisis has been accused of mishandling a case alleging that his then-deputy manipulated a woman into a sexual relationship, even as he counseled her husband on their marriage, heard her confessions and solicited their donations.

The actors in this sordid tale are as follows:

  • Daniel DiNardo, cardinal of the Galveston-Houston archdiocese and current President of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
  • Laura Pontikes, 55-year-old Houston construction executive and mother of three
  • Frank Rossi (monsignor), 62-year-old longtime chancellor and vicar general of the Galveston-Houston archdiocese
  • George Pontikes, Houston construction executive and husband of Laura Pontikes

According to the article:

Laura Pontikes reported that Rossi … seduced her when she came to him for spiritual counseling at a low point in her life.   Pontikes gave the archdiocese and the AP seven years of emails with Rossi to show her emotional dependency on him.   [Laura Pontikes first met Rossi in December 2007.]   His easy manner broke the ice, and soon the coiffed and charismatic preacher was calling her “Laura dear” and attending family dinners.   [Rossi] actively solicited donations, including for an ambitious capital campaign to rebuild the parish rectory.   In all, Pontikes estimated the couple gave the church more than $2 million over nine years.   

Pontikes’ husband, George, began reaching out to Rossi for help in March 2013 because of his wife’s increasing distance and irritability.   [Later], the priest and parishioner consummated the relationship, Laura Pontikes said.   It was the first of up to half a dozen such sexual encounters over more than a year, she said. The archdiocese disputed her account and said the two never had intercourse.   

[Laura Ponitkes] reported Monsignor Frank Rossi to the Galveston-Houston archdiocese in April 2016.    DiNardo initially declared her “the victim” and thanked her for coming forward, and his staff told her Rossi would never be a pastor or counsel women again, according to Pontikes.   But a few months later, DiNardo allowed Rossi to take up a new assignment as pastor at Our Lady of the Pines in Woodville, Texas.   

The archdiocese told AP the relationship was consensual.   In a statement, it said DiNardo put Rossi on leave after receiving the complaint, and returned him to active ministry without restrictions in a new diocese based on recommendations from an out-of-state “renewal” program for clergy that he had completed.   DiNardo’s archdiocese said it informed Rossi’s new boss, Beaumont Bishop Curtis Guillory, of his violation of the chastity vow and his time in the program.   

… Texas law states that sex with an adult is without consent if a clergyman exploits a person’s emotional dependency on him in a spiritual counseling relationship.   Pontikes’ Catholic therapist, Dr. Ken Buckle, said in a sworn affidavit that she was in crisis after being “seduced, betrayed and ultimately sexually victimized” by Rossi, and that the archdiocese’s decision to relocate Rossi to another parish was “highly distressing” to her because she felt he was a danger to other women.

Pontikes has also taken her case to the Vatican.   She said Rossi absolved her of their sexual sins at confession, a serious canonical crime DiNardo never asked her about.   The archdiocese said Rossi never heard her confession during or after the physical relationship.   However, several references to confession are found in the email correspondence Pontikes gave the archdiocese.

The author of this article, Nicole Winfield, has also written a lengthier and more detailed story on these matters, also dated June 5, 2019, which is available via the following link:    https://www.apnews.com/8a80c0c1276f4cc485e0599e922759c2

Pope Francis, Global Child Protection Summit, Vatican, 02-24-2019 (Giuseppe Lami/AFP/Getty Images)
Article Title

Has the Catholic Church committed the worst crime in U.S. history?

Link to Article:      https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/has-the-catholic-church-committed-the-worst-crime-in-us-history/2019/03/12/1875bb84-44ee-11e9-8aab-95b8d80a1e4f_story.html?utm_term=.48122dcd474c 

Source:  Washington Post

Author(s):  George F. Will

Date:  March 13, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

In its official documents, the Catholic Church’s bureaucracy has a history of using euphemisms (such as “horseplay” for child rape) to camouflage the church’s “pattern of abuse” and conspiracy of silence “that goes all the way to the Vatican.”   

National outrage about sexual abuse of minors by Catholic clergy was kindled in Boston, but it exploded into furry in Pennsylvania in August of 2018 with the release of the interim statewide grand jury report, courtesy of state Attorney General Josh Shapiro.   

Nationwide, the Catholic Church continues to stonewall and cover up and to resist discovery “every step of the way.”   The church challenged Shapiro’s jurisdiction and fought the release of the grand jury report.   

The church’s crime wave is global — not limited to the United States, as Vatican officials once-upon-a-time asserted — nor limited to English speaking countries (like Australia, Canada, and Ireland) as they later asserted.   The global tsunami of Catholic clerical crime has washed over Europe and Latin America.   It will no doubt inundate Africa and Asia as well.   

According to the article:

“It is highly unlikely that the abuses and conspiracies of silence about them are confined to Pennsylvania.   Asked whether this might be, cumulatively, the worst crime in U.S. history, Shapiro says: perhaps, considering the power of the guilty institution, the scale and prolonged nature of the crime, and the ‘sophisticated criminal coverup.’   He speaks of charging the guilty — when possible; many predatory priests have died, and statutes of limitations shield others — “the way you would typically charge the mob.”

DiNardo, US Catholic Cardinal and President of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Baltimore 11-12-2018 (Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)
Article Title

The Catholic Church proves incapable of exorcising clergy sex abuse — again

Link to Article:      https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-catholic-church-waves-a-red-flag-on-clergy-sex-abuse–again/2018/11/12/306dda44-e6b3-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html?utm_term=.02670babe45a

Source:  Washington Post

Author(s):  Editorial Board

Date:  November 12, 2018 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

Currently meeting in Baltimore to deal with the fallout from the August 2018 Pennsylvania Statewide Grand Jury Report, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has been hamstrung by the Vatican.   The bishops were on track to vote on two reforms:  establishment of a lay commission to review complaints against bishops and adoption of a code of ethical conduct for themselves.   But on the very first morning of the conference, Rome ordered them not to vote.   Supposedly, Jorge Bergoglio (aka Pope Francis) did not want the US bishops to get out ahead of the global church response.   Bergoglio has called for a summit meeting of the heads of all national bishops conferences from around the world to be held in the Vatican in February of 2019.   

According to the article:

“They [the US bishops] were stopped in their tracks by an abrupt message from the Vatican, which … arrived along with a warning from Pope Francis’s ambassador in the United States, Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who seemed to scoff at the proposal … to establish a lay commission that would assess bishops’ misconduct — ‘as if we were no longer capable of reforming or trusting ourselves,’ as he put it.”   

“That remark crystallized the arrogance that has often characterized the church’s stance even as countless exposés have laid bare the culpability of its leaders.   From high and low, the church has broadcast its conviction that its own transgressions are no worse than that of other institutions; that state statutes of limitations that shield dioceses from lawsuits should be preserved; that no foothold may be allowed for mechanisms to discipline bishops who have enabled abuse by transferring pedophile priests from parish to parish.”   

“The agenda was modest, and Rome’s intervention is telling.   Again and again, the Vatican pays lip service to the suffering of victims.   Again and again, it undercuts its own assertions of contrition.”   

Article Title
Dolan Announces Sexual Abuse Review. (Karsten Moran for The New York Times)

Church Sex Abuse Review Is Ordered by Cardinal Dolan

Link to Article:       https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/nyregion/cardinal-dolan-sex-abuse.html

Source:  New York Times

Author(s):  Sharon Otterman

Date:  September 20, 2018 

Synopsis of Article 

Timothy Dolan (a.k.a. Archbishop of New York and “Cardinal”) announced his appointment of a former federal judge to review policies, procedures, and practices governing the archdiocese’s response to allegations of sexual abuse of minors and sexual harassment of adults. 

Dolan’s appointee, Barbara S. Jones (formerly a judge in Federal District Court, Manhattan), will scrutinize compliance with protocols for the protection of minors, approved by the national conference of US Catholic bishops in 2002. For the most part, her investigation will not look back past 2002. She will report to Dolan and will be paid by the Archdiocese. Production of a public report of her findings and recommendations is not part of her mandate from the “Cardinal.” 

According to the article: 

The timing of Cardinal Dolan’s announcement left some skeptical that he was simply trying to get out in front of that investigation: officials have already issued subpoenas to the dioceses for all files relating to sexual abuse.

“I think that the Cardinal’s move is basically a P.R. move that was made under duress,” said Michael Reck, a lawyer who represents clergy abuse victims in cases against the diocese. “This is the type of thing that could have and should have been done years ago.”

Shaun Dougherty, a New York representative for SNAP, an advocacy group for survivors of clergy sex abuse, said that if Cardinal Dolan truly wanted transparency, he would stop lobbying the state legislature against the passage of the Child Victims Act, which would lift the statute of limitations for sex abuse cases and allow lawsuits against the church for abuse that took place decades ago.

“Today is just another distraction from the bigger picture,” he said. “The Roman Catholic hierarchy is fully aware that we have just merely scratched the surface into the extent of the cover-up of child sexual assault, and they are desperate to get this lid back on the bottle.”