Diocese knew of abuses years before it claims to have first known.
Article Title

Lake Charles Diocese knew of abuses years before listed dates; helped priests continue careers

Link to Article:      https://www.theadvocate.com/acadiana/news/article_ec82f556-a8ce-11e9-8b08-7fb7c465b43c.html

Source:  Acadiana Advocate

Author(s):  Ben Meyers

Date:  July 19, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

The Diocese of Lake Charles joined its six Louisiana counterparts three months ago in releasing a list of clergymen from its jurisdiction who have been “credibly accused” of sexually abusing minors. The lists were intended to answer nationwide public demands for accountability and transparency.

But although the Lake Charles list named predatory priests, it did so in a way that was less than transparent. 

Church officials learned of the abuses of two priests, Gerard Smit and Mark Broussard, years before the dates shown on the new list, records show. The discrepancies conceal periods in which the bishop at that time, Jude Speyrer, and others were aware of allegations and helped abusers continue their pastoral careers. 

Current Lake Charles church leaders say the “dates allegations received” entries reflect when victims put accusations in writing. That threshold was intended to ensure a consistent standard and not to deceive the public, church officials told The Advocate. But it also overlooks clear evidence that the bishop and others knew of abuses and failed to act.

Speyrer, for example, acknowledged in a 1986 letter that he had recently received a complaint that Smit “had been involved in some improper fondling of some small girls about twenty years ago” — in the mid-1960s, in other words — and that Smit did not deny it.

So Speyrer sent Smit to a Catholic-run psychological treatment center in Jemez Springs, New Mexico, and then referred Smit to the Diocese of Wilmington, Delaware, the next year “in good standing.”

Nonetheless, the diocese’s list says it first received allegations against Smit in 2002, making no mention of the allegations Speyrer received 16 years earlier.

In 1988, two years after Smit was treated in New Mexico, Broussard, the other of the two priests, was shipped to the same facility. That’s the year Broussard has said repeatedly that he admitted his abuses to diocesan officials.

However, the new diocesan list says church officials first received allegations against Broussard in 1994, six years after he was sent away for treatment. During that six-year span, Broussard worked as a Lake Charles hospital chaplain and as pastor at St. Eugene Church in Grand Chenier.

Allegations later surfaced that Broussard abused children in both of those assignments.

Smit and Broussard had been exposed as abusers long before the diocese released its list. Smit has never faced criminal prosecution, but the Diocese of Wilmington identified him on its list of credibly accused clergymen in 2006. Smit landed on the Wilmington list after a man told the diocese that Smit had abused him at St. Anne Church in Youngsville in the early 1960s.

Broussard, meanwhile, was convicted by a Calcasieu Parish jury in 2016 of five counts related to sexually assaulting minors, and he is now serving two life terms plus 55 years at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola.

However, the men who knew about their abuse and allowed them to continue in the ministry have not faced the same public scrutiny. In addition to Speyrer, they include the Rev. Henry Mancuso, a well-known retired priest who comes from a prominent Lake Charles family. Mancuso arranged for Broussard to work as a hospital chaplain after Broussard disclosed to Mancuso in 1988 that he had abused several children, according to Broussard’s statements to church officials a decade later.

Mancuso, reached by telephone, refused to discuss his 1988 conversation with Broussard, though he did acknowledge trying to help the predatory priest.

“I did whatever I could do to help him move beyond his time at the place in New Mexico,” Mancuso said by telephone.

Asked if that had allowed Broussard to continue abusing children, Mancuso said he didn’t know. The Broussard case is “old history,” Mancuso said before hanging up.

Joseph Caramanno sues Archdiocese of New York for sexual abuse. (Marla Diamond/WCBS 880)
Article Title

Victim: Catholic Priests Kept Jobs Despite Sex Abuse Claims

Link to Article:      https://wcbs880.radio.com/articles/alleged-sex-abuse-victim-says-catholic-priests-kept-jobs-despite-complaints 

Source:  WCBS News Radio 880

Author(s):  Local News

Date:  July 16, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

A new lawsuit filed Tuesday claims two Catholic priest that were accused of sexually abusing minors were allowed to remain active at their churches despite complaints to the archdiocese.

The lawsuit alleges church officials either covered up or misrepresented the abusive histories of Father Donald Timone and Monsignor John Paddack, who Joseph Caramanno says abused him when he was a student at St. Joseph’s by the Sea on Staten Island.

“I personally wonder if –while I was in high school back in 2001, 2002 – was there someone that knew about Monsignor Paddack, was there someone that knew that he had, you know, done some things to others before me,” Caramanno said.

The allegations forced Paddack to resign from the Church of Notre Dame on the Upper West Side.

Timone is accused of sexually abusing the late husband of one of the plaintiffs when he was a teenager. The alleged victim died from an apparent suicide in 2015.

“The allegations against Fr. Timone and Fr. Paddack were shared with law enforcement, and both are currently out of ministry while the archdiocese investigates these new allegations against them,” the archdiocese said in a statement.

It notes that earlier claims against the two were investigated but “were found not to be substantiated.”

Article Title

No answers from Washington archdiocese about McCarrick’s money

Link to Article:      https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/no-answers-from-washington-archdiocese-about-mccarricks-money-23070

Source:  Catholic News Agency

Author(s):  Ed Condon

Date:  July 12, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

More than one year after the announcement of allegations of sexual abuse against former cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the Archdiocese of Washington has continued to refuse questions about McCarrick’s use of a personal charitable fund. 

McCarrick funnelled hundreds of thousands of dollars through what was known as the Archbishop’s Fund, and reportedly made gifts to senior Vatican officials, even while the fund remained under the charitable auspices of the archdiocese.

Senior sources close to the Archdiocese of Washington have confirmed that archdiocesan records include the names of individuals, including senior Vatican figures, to whom McCarrick made payments from the fund.

But the Archdiocese of Washington has declined to disclose sources, sums, and uses of money, though it has acknowledged that the fund exists.

The archdiocese has also declined to comment on whether Archbishop Wilton Gregory will address accusations of financial misconduct by McCarrick, or publish the names of bishops who personally received gifts from the disgraced former archbishop. 

The former cardinal’s reputation for gift-giving and participation in so-called “envelope culture” has come under renewed scrutiny following recent revelations concerning former Wheeling-Charleston Bishop Michael Bransfield. 

Like Bransfield, McCarrick has faced a string of allegations of sexual misconduct, dating back years, and his ability to offer large financial gifts to other bishops has come under scrutiny as a possible reason he was able to operate unchecked for so long.

Several sources, among them cardinals, officials of the Roman curia, and McCarrick’s former staff members, have told CNA about McCarrick’s habit of visiting Rome and distributing cash or personal checks to senior officials. 

In light of the Bransfield report, CNA asked the Archdiocese of Washington if it would publish the names of bishops and other Church figures who had personally received gifts or donations from McCarrick’s Archbishop’s Fund. 

On July 10 the archdiocese declined to comment in response.

CNA also asked if the archdiocese could confirm whether information relating to the Archbishop’s Fund, including the names of beneficiaries, had been included in a report submitted to Rome as part of a Vatican investigation into McCarrick.

The archdiocese declined to comment.

CNA also asked if the archdiocese would be willing to comment, even in a general way, on the outstanding questions of financial propriety around McCarrick and Archbishop Gregory’s willingness or ability to offer a clear account of what has happened.

The archdiocese again declined to comment.

In August 2018 the Washington archdiocese told CNA that the fund was designated for McCarrick’s “personal works of charity and other miscellaneous expenses” and audited annually, along with all other archdiocesan accounts – although not included in any published financial reports or materials – and that “no irregularities were ever noticed.” 

If personal payments to Church officials in Rome were offered with money from the Archbishop’s Fund, it is unclear what “charitable purpose” or “miscellaneous expenses” they would have been for, or how such expenditures would have been recorded. 

Sources close to McCarrick and familiar with archdiocesan records have told CNA he made multiple “donations” to individuals with fund resources, and sources close to the archdiocesan chancery previously have told CNA that annual expenditures may have been examined only to ensure either a “broadly charitable” purpose or a “reasonable” miscellaneous expense.

The archdiocese declined to comment on the auditing process and standards used to evaluate McCarrick’s use of the Archbishop’s Fund over the years. 

In February the archdiocese told CNA that although the account was held under the umbrella of the archdiocese, the funds were considered to be McCarrick’s own to use as he wished, but a former financial advisor to the archdiocese told CNA on July 11 that the fund was, for accounting purposes, archdiocesan money.

Despite archdiocesan refusal to comment, CNA has learned that McCarrick established the Archbishop’s Fund during his time in Newark, using money received through personal financial gifts he obtained in the course of his ministry, through private fundraising initiatives, and from grantmaking foundations for which he served as a board member. 

According to former chancery officials in Newark and Washington, when McCarrick moved between the archdioceses in 2001, he arranged for the money to be transferred from his fund in Newark to a newly created Archbishop’s Fund in Washington.

Several sources familiar with the transaction told CNA that the transfer took the form of a check sent to Washington by the Archdiocese of Newark. Multiple sources told CNA that the check’s amount was well in excess of $100,000.

Later, as a cardinal, McCarrick used his position as a board member on various grant-making foundations to assign regular five-figure grants to his own foundation, with two such foundations alone registering donations to the Archbishop’s Fund totaling $500,000.

McCarrick reportedly cultivated a network of very wealthy individuals who would donate tens of thousands of dollars to his discretionary fund. 

“People would give him money all the time, in parishes when he’d visit as archbishop, but also privately – he was a natural fundraiser,” one former priest-secretary told CNA.

Another former chancery official told CNA that even during his time in Newark, McCarrick attracted considerable personal support from friends and benefactors. 

“We are easily talking about six-figure sums every year,” he said. 

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey has filed a lawsuit against the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston based on consumer protection laws.
Article Title

Morrisey renews request for Diocese to release Bransfield report

Link to Article:      https://wvrecord.com/stories/512694348-morrisey-renews-request-for-diocese-to-release-bransfield-report

Source:  West Virginia Record

Author(s):  Kyla Asbury

Date:  July 3, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

According to the article:  

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey urged again for the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston to release its report on former Bishop Michael Bransfield, calling the Diocese’s attempt to dismiss his suit an attempt to conceal the report.

“The Diocese’s latest motion to dismiss represents yet another attempt to sidestep transparency as it continues to conceal its investigative report on former Bishop Bransfield in hopes to distract public attention from allegations that it employed pedophiles, failed to conduct background checks and condoned Bransfield’s alleged sexual harassment of employees and others,” Morrisey said in a statement. “The Diocese did not issue its list of credibly accused priests until after issuance of our first investigative subpoena in fall 2018, and continues to demonstrate a pattern of concealing information until external pressure from our office and the media forces its hand.”

Morrisey said his office’s lawsuit against the Diocese chronicles its decades-long pattern of concealing criminal behavior of priests as it relates to sexual abuse of children, while it advertised its schools and camps as safe learning environments.

Morrisey filed suit against the Diocese and Bransfield in March alleging the Diocese knowingly employed pedophiles and failed to conduct adequate background checks for those working at the Diocese’s schools and camps, all without disclosing the inherent danger to parents who purchased its services for their children. The complaint was amended in May to include several more counts and new evidence.

The updated complaint, filed May 21 in Wood Circuit Court, includes a new count of unfair competition and new evidence of the church’s failure to conduct background checks and report abuse. The amended complaint also includes allegations the Diocese chose not to publicly disclose a report of child sexual abuse by a teacher in 2006 and permitted several individuals to work or volunteer at Catholic schools without adequate background checks.

The count of unfair competition in the amended complaint alleges the Diocese omitted the fact that it knowingly employed priests who had admitted to or been accused of sexually abusing children in advertising materials for prospective students. It says those materials also didn’t mention the Diocese didn’t do background checks on its employees.

In April, the Diocese filed a motion to dismiss the AG’s lawsuit.

Sean O’Malley, left; Timothy Dolan, right. (AP, left; AFP/Getty Images, right)
Article Title

Breaking ranks: why Boston’s cardinal intervened in an abuse case in New York

Link to Article:       https://catholicherald.co.uk/magazine/breaking-ranks-why-bostons-cardinal-intervened-in-an-abuse-case-in-new-york/

Source:  Catholic Herald

Author(s):  J. Arthur Bloom

Date:  January 10, 2019 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from Article 

On December 20, 2018 the New York Times ran a story (written by Sharon Otterman) describing a situation in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, wherein Donald Timone, a priest on whose account the Archdiocese paid two child sexual abuse settlements, has been openly exercising the faculties of his ministry (saying mass in public, hearing confessions, teaching at a university, and serving as a counselor for Catholics with same-sex attraction, encouraging them to refrain from acting on their homosexual urges). 

On 21 December 2018, Sean O’Malley (a.k.a. Archbishop of Boston and “Cardinal”) dispatched a letter to Christophe Pierre (a.k.a. the Papal Nuncio, or pope’s ambassador to the United States) in Washington D.C., calling his attention to Otterman’s New York Times article of the 20th, regarding Timone. In his letter O’Malley disclosed that he himself had received correspondence from someone in New York. In O’Malley’s letter to Pierre, the name of O’Malley’s New York correspondent is redacted. O’Malley in Boston wrote the following to Pierre in Washington:  “I note the seriousness of the allegations [redacted] presents with regard to Rev Timone and that today the New York Times has published an extensive report concerning the allegations against Rev Timone.”

According to the Catholic Herald article: 

Timone had been allowed to remain in ministry despite several settlements with people who had accused him of sexual misconduct. Church-watchers quickly concluded that O’Malley was, in effect, reporting New York archbishop Cardinal Timothy Dolan to the nuncio. 

One can safely assume that the nuncio does not need someone to read The New York Times for him, and this was more about O’Malley going on the record (at least to insiders) with his disapproval of the handling of cases in New York. Yet there is also what one might call a second track to this story. The main story is the Times report and the response to it, which revealed the settlements and questioned why the priest had been allowed to remain in ministry, and O’Malley’s decision to intervene. The second track, which played out in the Catholic press, concerns a small Catholic college trying to get a straight answer about Fr [“Father”] Timone. 

Here is the timeline of events: on December 13, administrators at John Paul the Great University in California received a letter of suitability for Fr Timone from the Archdiocese of New York, sent on December 4. Then, on December 20, the New York Times broke the news about ongoing investigations into Fr Timone, prompting the college to seek clarification from the Archdiocese of New York. On December 21, Cardinal O’Malley sent a letter to the papal nuncio to the United States, Archbishop Christophe Pierre. Fr Timone was removed from ministry.

According to Ed Condon at the Catholic News Agency, Fr Timone had taught on a yearly basis at the school for a decade. Suitability letters were sent every year, as is required of priests operating outside the diocese in which they are incardinated. Fr Timone had previously been investigated in 2002 and 2003. So the archdiocese did not disclose that Fr Timone was under investigation in any of the suitability letters it sent to the college. Officials at John Paul the Great evidently felt betrayed and spoke to reporters.

Article Title
Donald Timone, Catholic priest, during mass at St. Joseph’s Church in Middletown, N.Y., in early Dec. 2018. (Dana Ullman for The New York Times)

Priest Who Was Still Saying Mass After Abuse Settlements Is Suspended

Link to Article:       https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/23/nyregion/father-donald-timone-suspended.html

Source:  New York Times

Author(s):  Sharon Otterman

Date:  December 23, 2018 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from the Article 

The Archdiocese of New York has suspended a priest who had continued his clerical duties despite two settlements paid for allegations of sexual abuse of teenage boys.

The Rev. Donald G. Timone, 84, is the subject of an internal investigation by the archdiocese, but had continued to celebrate Mass in New York and California, more than a year and a half after an archdiocesan compensation program paid settlements to the two men, as detailed last week by The New York Times. [See the entry in this chronology for 2018-12-20.]

A spokesman for the archdiocese, Joseph Zwilling, said on Friday that the archdiocese would no longer allow Father Timone to remain in ministry while it weighed permanently removing him. 

Those settlements did not trigger Father Timone’s removal from the ministry despite the archdiocese’s “zero-tolerance” policy on child sexual abuse, Mr. Zwilling said, because the compensation program functioned separately from the archdiocese’s own internal process for substantiating abuse allegations. 

“It’s reprehensible that Cardinal Dolan allowed this priest to minister for years to sexually vulnerable minors,” said Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of BishopAccountability.org, which tracks clergy abuse. “The cardinal put other children at risk. And it raises the question: How many other accused priests is he concealing?”

Lidy Connolly, the vice president of administration at John Paul the Great Catholic University in California, where Father Timone has been working as a chaplain, spiritual adviser and teacher, said that the Archdiocese of New York had informed the university on Wednesday that Father Timone’s letter of good standing — a required credential for a priest — had been revoked. He was no longer working there, she said.

Donald Timone, Catholic priest, during mass at St. Joseph’s Church in Middletown, N.Y., in early Dec. 2018. (Dana Ullman for The New York Times)
Article Title

The Church Settled Sexual Abuse Cases Against This Priest. Why Is He Still Saying Mass?

Link to Article:       https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/20/nyregion/reverend-donald-timone-sexual-abuse.html

Source:  New York Times

Author(s):  Sharon Otterman

Date:  December 20, 2018 

Synopsis of / Excerpts from the Article 

The article describes a situation in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, wherein Donald Timone, a priest on whose account the Archdiocese paid two child sexual abuse settlements, has been openly exercising the faculties of his ministry (saying mass in public, hearing confessions, teaching at a university, and serving as a counselor for Catholics with same-sex attraction, encouraging them to refrain from acting on their homosexual urges). 

According to the article: 

The settlements paid by the Archdiocese of New York were for substantiated allegations that Father Timone had sexually abused teenage boys he was counseling, one of whom committed suicide after what his widow said was a decades-long struggle with what had happened to him.

The New York archdiocese is essentially allowing Father Timone to continue serving as a priest because of a bureaucratic technicality — a position that seems to fly in the face of the pledge by Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, the archbishop of the New York Archdiocese, to aggressively handle sexual abuse accusations.

The archdiocese maintains that Father Timone has been allowed to remain because the church itself did not rule on his fitness; that judgment was made by a separate, church-sponsored panel, the Independent Reconciliation and Compensation Program. The settlements were paid in 2017 through that program. 

The archdiocese has its own internal process for substantiating abuse claims. And though it initially suspended Father Timone and investigated an allegation lodged against him in 2002, its review board did not substantiate the accusation at the time, the spokesman for the archdiocese, Joseph Zwilling, said last week.

Responding to questions from The New York Times, Mr. Zwilling added that the case had now been reopened to determine if Father Timone should be removed from the ministry, but that he would not be suspended during that investigation. 

Article Title
Archbishop of Chicago, Blase “Cardinal” Cupich, center. (Tannen Maury/ European Pressphoto Agency)

Catholic Church in Illinois Withheld Names of at Least 500 Priests Accused of Abuse, Attorney General Says

Link to Article:  https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/illinois-attorney-general-catholic-church-priest-abuse.html

Source:  New York Times

Author(s):   Laurie Goodstein and  Monica Davey 

Date:  December 19, 2018 

Synopsis of Article 

Six Catholic dioceses in Illinois withheld names of 500 priests accused of sexually abusing minors.   The church neglected to investigate allegations. 

Issued on December 19, 2018 by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, the report, which is preliminary, concludes that “the Catholic dioceses in Illinois are incapable of investigating themselves and ‘will not resolve the clergy sexual abuse crisis on their own.’” 

Allegations were lodged against 690 priests but only 185 names were released as having been found to be credibly accused.  

Only nine pages long, the Illinois preliminary report does not identify the priests who have been accused or name specific bishops for negligence.

Diocesan files showed that three quarters of the abuse allegations were either not investigated by the dioceses or investigated but not substantiated. 

According to the article: 

A pattern emerged from the files in which dioceses often failed to find a claim credible if there was only one victim, the report said. They also failed to investigate at all if the accused priest was deceased or reassigned, or belonged to a religious order (such as the Franciscans, Marists or Jesuits). The dioceses often discredited survivors’ claims by “focusing on the survivors’ personal lives,” the report said.

“The priority has always been in protecting priests and protecting church assets,” Ms. Madigan said in an interview. “Time and time again, the church says, ‘Well, this all took place years and years ago.’ But it’s a crisis in the present for all the people who have had to live with it.”

 

USCCB Meeting, Baltimore, November 2018 (Reuters) —
Vatican tells bishops not to vote on policy reforms that would impose heightened compliance and accountability standards on the Catholic hierarchy.
Article Title

Vatican tells U.S. bishops not to vote on proposals to tackle sexual abuse, spurns outside investigations

Link to Article:      https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2018/11/12/vatican-asks-us-bishops-not-vote-sexual-abuse-proposals-they-planned/?utm_term=.60cae7d53552

Source:  Washington Post

Author(s):  Julie Zauzmer and Michelle Boorstein

Date:  November 12, 2018 

Synopsis of Article 

The leadership and membership of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) came to Baltimore for their Fall 2018 meeting poised to vote on measures intended to address the spiritual and legal cancer of child sexual abuse and concealment that has metastasized across the world-wide Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican, however, intervened at the eleventh hour and demanded that the US bishops not vote on the proposals before them. 

The proposed measures included a code of conduct for bishops (sorely needed as a response to the scandalous rise and precipitous fall of the child-molesting ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick) and creation of a lay-led commission vested with the power to investigate misconduct by bishops (and cardinals, all of whom are also bishops). 

The President of the USCCB, Daniel DiNardo (a.k.a. Daniel Cardinal DiNardo) said that the Vatican insisted the vote be deferred until after a summit meeting in Rome late in February 2019, at which the heads of national bishops conferences from around the world are supposed to thrash out the “universal” church’s response to the clerical child sexual abuse crisis. There has been much speculation as to why the Vatican blocked the vote. One distinct possibility is Vatican concern regarding legal issues surrounding mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse allegations to civil authorities and the Vatican’s insistence on the primacy of Cannon Law over Civil Law for clerics charged with abuse.

Archbishop Christophe Pierre, the Vatican’s ambassador to the US (a.k.a. the papal nuncio), telegraphed the Vatican concerns when he addressed the Conference and helpfully warned the bishops not to trust investigations by external (law enforcement) agencies. According to the article, Pierre said: 

“There may be a temptation on the part of some to relinquish responsibility for reform to others from ourselves, as if we were no longer capable of reforming or trusting ourselves. Assistance is both welcome and necessary, and surely collaboration with the laity is essential. However, the responsibility as bishops of this Catholic Church is ours.”